SKIN TOXICITY OF TARGETED THERAPY: VEMURAFENIB, FIRST EXPERIENCES FROM MONTENEGRO

Vladimir Todorovic, Danilo Martinovic

Abstract


Introduction: Data on melanoma incidence and mortality in Montenegro is only partially complete. GLOBOCAN and EUCAN reports estimate melanoma incidence in Montenegro to be between 4.6-7.3 cases/100 000.

At least 50% of all metastatic melanoma cell lines carry an activating mutation in the BRAF oncogene. The treatment of advanced melanoma with the selective BRAF inhibitors, such as vemurafenib demonstrated improvement in progression free interval and overall survival when compared to conventional chemotherapy treatment. Up to 95% of patients treated with vemurafenib experience skin toxicity.

Material and methods: Five patients with metastatic melanoma have been treated with vemurafenib at the Clinic for Oncology and Radiotherapy Podgorica, Montenegro, during the period 2013-2014. They were treated with standard dose (960 mg twice a day, per os). Data about the occurrence and management of skin side-effects in these patients were retrospectively collected from medical charts. Severity of side-effects was graded using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.

Results: In 2013, 41 new cases of melanoma were registered in Montenegro, 20 (48.7%) male and 21 (51.3%) female. In 2014, 49 new cases of melanoma were registered, 27 (55.1%) male and 22 (44.9%) female. Two out of five (40%) vemurafenib treated patients experienced photosensitivity, three (60%) had rash eruptions, four (80%) developed alopecia, and two (40%) had dry skin problems. Alteration in nevus color and size occurred in one (20%) patient, and two (40%) patients developed new pigmented lesions.

Conclusion: Skin side effects associated with vemurafenib are plentiful, but generally manageable with supportive care measures. In our experience, majority of described side-effects were of grade 1 or 2, and none required dose modifications, or discontinuation of the therapy. Our experience suggests that patients taking BRAF inhibitors should have regular full body skin assessments, both prior to the beginning of the therapy and periodically after its onset. Clinicians should be aware of the skin related toxicities, in order to minimize their impact on treatment efficacy and patients' quality of life.


Keywords


melanoma, vemurafenib, skin side effects

Full Text:

PDF

References


American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2014. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/webcontent/acspc-042151.pdf, accessed on 05/11/2014.

Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr, accessed on 12/12/2014.

Steliarova-Foucher E, O’Callaghan M, Ferlay J, et al. European Cancer Observatory: Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Prevalence and Survival in Europe. Version 1.0 (September 2012) European Network of Cancer Registries, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available from http://eco.iarc.fr, accessed on 12/12/2014.

Platz A, Egyhazi S, Ringborg U, Hansson J. Human cutaneous melanoma; a review of NRAS and BRAF mutation frequencies in relation to histogenetic subclass and body site. Mol Oncol. 2008; 1(4): 395–405.

Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002; 417(6892): 949–54.

Flaherty KT, Puzanov I, Kim KB, et al. Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(9): 809–19.

Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, et al. Improved survival with Vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(26): 2507–16.

Sosman JA, Kim KB, Schuchter L et al. Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with Vemurafenib. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(8): 707–14.

Robert C, Arnault JP, Mateus C. RAF inhibition and induction of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2011; 23(2): 177–82.

Robert C, Soria JC, Spatz A, et al. Cutaneous side-effects of kinase inhibitors and blocking antibodies. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6(7): 491–500.

McArthur GA, Chapman PB, Robert C, et al. Safety and efficacy of Vemurafenib in BRAFV600E and BRAFV600K mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): extended follow-up of a phase 3, randomised, open-label study. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(3): 323–32.

Lacouture ME, Duvic M, Hauschild A, et al. Analysis of dermatologic events in vemurafenib-treated patients with melanoma. Oncologist. 2013; 18(3): 314–22.

United States, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute (nci). Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Ver. 4.03. Bethesda, MD; 2010. [Available online at: http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf; cited April 29, 2012].

Lacouture ME. Mechanisms of cutaneous toxicities to EGFR inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006; 6(10): 803–12.

Mattei PL, Alora-Palli MB, Kraft S, Lawrence DP, Flaherty KT, Kimball AB. Cutaneous effects of BRAF inhibitor therapy: a case series. Ann Oncol. 2013; 24(2): 530–7.

Dummer R, Rinderknecht J, Goldinger SM. Ultraviolet A and photosensitivity during vemurafenib therapy. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(5): 480–1.

Fourtanier A, Moyal D, Seite S. Sunscreens containing the broad-spectrum UVA absorber, Mexoryl SX, prevent the cutaneous detrimental effects of UV exposure: a review of clinical study results. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2008; 24(4): 164–74.

Oberholzer PA, Kee D, Dziunycz P, et al. RAS mutations are associated with the development of cutaneous squamous cell tumors in patients treated with RAF inhibitors. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(3): 316-21.

Kingman J, Callen JP. Keratoacanthoma. A clinical study. Arch Dermatol. 1984; 120(6): 736–40.

Ko CJ. Keratoacanthoma: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2010; 28(3): 254–61.

Boukamp P. Non-melanoma skin cancer: what drives tumor development and progression? Carcinogenesis. 2005; 26(10): 1657–67.

Giglia-Mari G, Sarasin A. TP53 mutations in human skin cancers. Hum Mutat. 2003; 21(3): 217–28.

Noor R, Trinh V, Kim K et al. BRAF-targeted therapy for metastatic melanoma: rationale, clinical activity and safety. Clin Invest. 2011; 1(8): 1127–39.

Williams VL, Cohen PR, Stewart DJ. Sorafenib-induced premalignant and malignant skin lesions. Int J Dermatol. 2011; 50(4): 396–402.

Kwon EJ, Kish LS, Jaworsky C. The histologic spectrum of epithelial neoplasms induced by sorafenib. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009; 61(3): 522–7.

Heidorn SJ, Milagre C, Whittaker S, et al. Kinase-dead BRAF and oncogenic RAS cooperate to drive tumor progression through CRAF. Cell. 2010; 140(2): 209–21.

Hatzivassiliou G, Song K, Yen I, et al. RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. Nature. 2010; 464(7287): 431–5.

Poulikakos PI, Zhang C, Bollag G, Shokat KM, Rosen N. RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signaling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Nature. 2010; 464(7287): 427–30.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24125/sanamed.v10i2.37

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 SANAMED

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.